| Return on Equity (ROE) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investing Lesson 4 - Analyzing an Income Statement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Return on Equity ROE A business that has a high return on equity is more likely to be one that is capable of generating cash internally. For the most part, the higher a companys return on equity compared to its industry, the better. This should be obvious to even the less-than-astute investor If you owned a business that had a net worth [shareholders equity] of $100 million dollars and it made $5 million in profit, it would be earning 5% on your equity [$5 / $100 = .05, or 5%]. The higher you can get the return on your equity, in this case 5%, the better.
Formula for Return on Equity
Net Profit
Return on Equity
Example
Now that we have the income statement and balance sheet in front of us, our only job is to plug a the numbers into our equation. The earnings for 2001 were $21,906,000 [because the amounts are in thousands, take the figure shown, in this case $21,906, and multiply by 1,000. Almost all publicly traded companies short-hand their financial statements in thousands or millions to save space]. The average shareholder equity for the period is $209,154,000 [$222,192,000 + 196,116,000 divided by 2]. Lets plug the numbers into the formula.
$21,906,000 earnings The answer is 0.1047, or 10.47%. This 10.47% is the return that management is earning on shareholder equity. Is this good? For most of the twentieth century, the S&P 500 [a measure of the biggest and best public companies in America] averaged ROE's of 10 to 15%. In the 1990s, the average return on equity was in excess of 20%. Obviously, these twenty-plus percent figures probably wont endure forever. In the past two years alone, small and large corporations alike have issued repeated earnings revisions, warning investors they will not meet analysts quarterly and / or annual estimates. Return on equity is particularly important because it can help you cut through the garbage spieled out by most CEOs in their annual reports about, achieving record earnings. Warren Buffett pointed out years ago that achieving higher earnings each year is an easy task. Why? Each year, a successful company generates profits. If management did nothing more than retain those earnings and stick them a simple passbook savings account yielding 4% annually, they would be able to report record earnings because of the interest they earned. Were the shareholders better off? Not at all; they would have enjoyed heftier returns had the earnings been paid out. This makes obvious that investors cannot look at rising per-share earnings each year as a sign of success. The return on equity figure takes into account the retained earnings from previous years, and tells investors how effectively their capital is being reinvested. Thus, it serves as a far better gauge of managements fiscal adeptness than the annual earnings per share. The return on equity calculation can be as detailed as you desire. Most financial sites and resources calculate return on common equity by taking the income available to the common stock holders for the trailing [most recent] twelve months and dividing it by the average shareholder equity for the most recent five quarters. Some analysts will actually annualize the recent quarter by simply taking the current income and multiplying it by four. The theory is that this will equal the annual income of the business. In many cases, this can lead to disastrous and grossly incorrect results. Take a retail store such as Lord & Taylor or American Eagle, for example. In some cases, fifty-percent or more of the stores income and revenue is generated in the fourth quarter during the traditional Christmas shopping period. An investor should be exceedingly cautious not to annualize the earnings for seasonal businesses. Next page > Calculating Asset Turnover> << back, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, Segment 2 >> |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Join the Money Newsletter for even more great articles and lessons!

